home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Sat, 1 Oct 94 09:51:48 PDT
- From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams@ucsd.edu>
- Errors-To: Info-Hams-Errors@UCSD.Edu
- Reply-To: Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu
- Precedence: List
- Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #1082
- To: Info-Hams
-
-
- Info-Hams Digest Sat, 1 Oct 94 Volume 94 : Issue 1082
-
- Today's Topics:
- 900 Mhz phone questions ...
- ARLB076 New ITU Radiocommunication Director
- ARLP040 Propagation de KT7H
- Courtesy In Amateur Radio
- Daily Summary of Solar Geophysical Activity for 29 September
- IPS Daily Report - 30 September 94
- Radio Shack Violation (2 msgs)
- Summary: Shops in NYC and Boston
- The Hamblaster
- What does all call signs have been issued?
- Yaesu 5200- How do u like?
-
- Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu>
- Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
- Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
-
- Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
- (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".
-
- We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
- herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
- policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 94 10:12:33 PDT
- From: sgross@enet.net
- Subject: 900 Mhz phone questions ...
-
- In article <36ckud$qpr@nntp1.u.washington.edu>, <aalto@u.washington.edu>
- writes:
- > Subject: 900 Mhz phone questions ...
-
- > I just got a new AT&T digital cordless 900Mhz phone, and although it
- > is indeed an improvement over my old cordless, I need more range.>
- > 1) Get a phone with higher output. The phone I have is at the FCC Max, but
- > could I get a higher output phone
- >
- > 2) Get a good 900Mhz antenna for the base unit
- > 3) Buy or make a 900Mhz amplifier for the base unit. Are these or the
- > plans for them available ??
- >
- >
- > Are there any other options I should consider? Ideally, I'd like about
- > two miles of range on a phone that costs less than $500.
-
-
-
- >>
- >>
- >>
- >>
- >>
- >>
-
-
- All of the options you mentioned are not practical and may be
- in violation of FCC rules.
-
- In my opinion, you would still be better off with a celluar phone.
- Some of the cell phone companies offer a service that will forward
- your call to the cellphone if you do not answer you home phone and
- also forward your cellphone to your home if you do not answer it
- after a predetermined amount of rings.
-
- I have a Tropez 900Mhz cordless phone and it's range is about 1/2 mile
- for a full quieting noise free signal. It's by far the best of the
- units I have checked out and it includes digital encryption.
-
- Best regards-
-
- -steve
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1994 17:48:42 EDT
- From: w1aw@arrl.org
- Subject: ARLB076 New ITU Radiocommunication Director
-
- SB QST @ ARL $ARLB076
- ARLB076 New ITU Radiocommunication Director
-
- ZCZC AG41
- QST de W1AW
- ARRL Bulletin 76 ARLB076
- From ARRL Headquarters
- Newington CT September 30, 1994
- To all radio amateurs
-
- SB QST ARL ARLB076
- ARLB076 New ITU Radiocommunication Director
-
- At the ITU Plenipotentiary Conference in Kyoto, Japan, on September
- 30, the International Telecommunication Union elected Canadian radio
- amateur Robert W. Jones, VE3CTM, to replace retiring Richard C.
- Kirby, W0LCT, as Director of its Radiocommunication Bureau.
-
- Jones, 50, of Ottawa, is currently the Director General of the Radio
- Regulatory Branch, under Industry and Science Canada, which regulates
- amateur and other radio services. His work with the ITU began in 1975
- in preparation for the 1977 and 1979 World Administrative Radio
- Conferences. From 1981 to 1983 he was director of a project to
- automate ITU frequency records. He has since served and headed
- Canadian delegations to numerous ITU conferences and working groups.
- He holds Master of Applied Science and Master of Business
- Administration degrees, and attributes his professional interest
- in radiocommunication to having become a licensed radio amateur
- as a teenager in 1959.
- NNNN
- /EX
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1994 17:47:49 EDT
- From: w1aw@arrl.org
- Subject: ARLP040 Propagation de KT7H
-
- SB PROP @ ARL $ARLP040
- ARLP040 Propagation de KT7H
-
- ZCZC AP54
- QST de W1AW
- Propagation Forecast Bulletin 40 ARLP040
- From Tad Cook, KT7H
- Seattle, WA September 30, 1994
- To all radio amateurs
-
- SB PROP ARL ARLP040
- ARLP040 Propagation de KT7H
-
- Average solar flux was up by only a few points last week.
- Geomagnetic indices have also risen a bit, signaling some
- instability. Very low levels of solar activity should continue,
- with a recurring coronal hole causing active geomagnetic conditions
- around October 4 or 5. Solar flux should rise to about 85 after the
- first of the month, and then drop back to around 70 by October 17.
-
- Sunspot Numbers for September 22 through 28 were 15, 17, 20, 35, 43,
- 36 and 35, with a mean of 28.7. 10.7 cm flux was 70.7, 71.4, 72.8,
- 76.2, 77, 74.7 and 74, with a mean of 73.8.
-
- The path projection for this week is from Togo (5V) and Norfolk,
- Virginia.
-
- 80 meters looks good from 2230 to 0600z, peaking around 0030 to
- 0500. 40 meters should be open from 2130 to 0700, and 30 meters
- from 2030 to 0400, with 30 meters open as late as 0700 on many days.
- 20 meters should be open from 1700 to 0000, peaking toward the end
- of the period. Check 17 meters from 1330 to 2200, and 15 meters
- from 1500 to 2000. 12 meters may be open on some days from 1530 to
- 2000. 10 meters does not look promising, but on rare occasions it
- may be open some time between 1500 and 2100.
- NNNN
- /EX
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Sep 1994 20:50:37 -0700
- From: hbs@crl.com (Henry B. Smith)
- Subject: Courtesy In Amateur Radio
-
- ron miller (ron@fc.hp.com) wrote:
- : ... Stuff deleted ...
- :
- : I've had more fun on HF since I've learned CW at 20+ WPM. I gave up on
- : SSB about the time I started it 23 years ago. Couldn't put up
- : big beams or afford high power at age 14.
-
- Come on Ron, dont scare everybody off with this 20+ WPM stuff :-}
-
- Folks, if you are tired of the same old drill on HF SSB and you are
- willing to try a challenge, come down to the CW part of the band and listen.
-
- It's not all at 20+ WPM, there's probably plenty of QSO's at exactly
- your speed somewhere down there.
-
- The folks are friendly and they dont blow you off just becuz they
- dont know you.
-
- Been there, done it, like it,
-
- Smitty, NA5K
-
- --
- Henry Smith (hbs@crl.com)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 94 13:49:51 MDT
- From: oler@ultrix.uleth.ca (Cary Oler)
- Subject: Daily Summary of Solar Geophysical Activity for 29 September
-
- /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
-
- DAILY SUMMARY OF SOLAR GEOPHYSICAL ACTIVITY
-
- 29 SEPTEMBER, 1994
-
- /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
-
- (Based In-Part On SESC Observational Data)
-
-
- SOLAR AND GEOPHYSICAL ACTIVITY INDICES FOR 29 SEPTEMBER, 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------
-
- !!BEGIN!! (1.0) S.T.D. Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for DAY 272, 09/29/94
- 10.7 FLUX=074.7 90-AVG=079 SSN=024 BKI=3131 1110 BAI=005
- BGND-XRAY=A2.6 FLU1=2.2E+05 FLU10=1.4E+04 PKI=2232 1111 PAI=007
- BOU-DEV=026,008,025,009,008,008,006,003 DEV-AVG=011 NT SWF=00:000
- XRAY-MAX= B4.0 @ 0132UT XRAY-MIN= A2.1 @ 2101UT XRAY-AVG= A4.4
- NEUTN-MAX= +003% @ 1605UT NEUTN-MIN= -001% @ 2335UT NEUTN-AVG= +0.6%
- PCA-MAX= +0.2DB @ 1420UT PCA-MIN= -0.2DB @ 2140UT PCA-AVG= +0.0DB
- BOUTF-MAX=55208NT @ 2229UT BOUTF-MIN=55191NT @ 1646UT BOUTF-AVG=55202NT
- GOES7-MAX=P:+000NT@ 0000UT GOES7-MIN=N:+000NT@ 0000UT G7-AVG=+069,+000,+000
- GOES6-MAX=P:+120NT@ 2051UT GOES6-MIN=N:-014NT@ 1646UT G6-AVG=+098,+021,+003
- FLUXFCST=STD:075,077,078;SESC:075,077,078 BAI/PAI-FCST=005,005,010/010,010,015
- KFCST=2233 3111 2122 2212 27DAY-AP=006,005 27DAY-KP=3311 2111 2221 1111
- WARNINGS=
- ALERTS=
- !!END-DATA!!
-
- NOTE: The Effective Sunspot Number for 28 SEP 94 is not available.
- The Full Kp Indices for 28 SEP 94 are: 4- 3o 4- 4o 2- 2- 2- 1o
- The 3-Hr Ap Indices for 28 SEP 94 are: 21 15 22 30 6 6 6 4
- Greater than 2 MeV Electron Fluence for 29 SEP is: 3.8E+07
-
-
- SYNOPSIS OF ACTIVITY
- --------------------
-
- Solar activity was very low. Three weak optically
- uncorrelated B-class events were reported this period. The
- largest of these was a B4 occurring at 29/0132UT. Region 7782
- rotated around the limb. No other significant changes noted.
-
- Solar activity forecast: solar activity is expected to be
- very low.
-
- STD: Yohkoh x-ray imagery indicates another active region is
- approaching the east limb. It does not appear to be very
- large.
-
- The geomagnetic field has been at quiet to unsettled
- levels for the past 24 hours. The greater than 2 MeV energetic
- electron flux has been mostly moderate for the past 24 hours.
-
- Geophysical activity forecast: the geomagnetic field is
- expected to be quiet to unsettled for the next three days.
-
- Event probabilities 30 sep-02 oct
-
- Class M 01/01/01
- Class X 01/01/01
- Proton 01/01/01
- PCAF Green
-
- Geomagnetic activity probabilities 30 sep-02 oct
-
- A. Middle Latitudes
- Active 10/10/15
- Minor Storm 05/05/05
- Major-Severe Storm 01/01/01
-
- B. High Latitudes
- Active 15/10/15
- Minor Storm 10/05/10
- Major-Severe Storm 01/01/01
-
- HF propagation conditions were near-normal over all
- regions. Near-normal conditions should continue over the next
- 72 hours, through 02 October inclusive.
-
-
- COPIES OF JOINT USAF/NOAA SESC SOLAR GEOPHYSICAL REPORTS
- ========================================================
-
- REGIONS WITH SUNSPOTS. LOCATIONS VALID AT 29/2400Z SEPTEMBER
- ------------------------------------------------------------
- NMBR LOCATION LO AREA Z LL NN MAG TYPE
- 7781 S07W87 222 0030 CAO 05 003 BETA
- 7783 S07E32 103 0080 HSX 02 001 ALPHA
- 7782 N03W92 227 PLAGE
- REGIONS DUE TO RETURN 30 SEPTEMBER TO 02 OCTOBER
- NMBR LAT LO
- NONE
-
-
- LISTING OF SOLAR ENERGETIC EVENTS FOR 29 SEPTEMBER, 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------
- BEGIN MAX END RGN LOC XRAY OP 245MHZ 10CM SWEEP
- NONE
-
-
- POSSIBLE CORONAL MASS EJECTION EVENTS FOR 29 SEPTEMBER, 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------
- BEGIN MAX END LOCATION TYPE SIZE DUR II IV
- NO EVENTS OBSERVED
-
-
- INFERRED CORONAL HOLES. LOCATIONS VALID AT 29/2400Z
- ---------------------------------------------------
- ISOLATED HOLES AND POLAR EXTENSIONS
- EAST SOUTH WEST NORTH CAR TYPE POL AREA OBSN
- NO DATA AVAILABLE FOR ANALYSIS
-
-
- SUMMARY OF FLARE EVENTS FOR THE PREVIOUS UTC DAY
- ------------------------------------------------
-
- Date Begin Max End Xray Op Region Locn 2695 MHz 8800 MHz 15.4 GHz
- ------ ---- ---- ---- ---- -- ------ ------ --------- --------- ---------
- 28 Sep: 2217 2228 2239 B2.6
-
-
- REGION FLARE STATISTICS FOR THE PREVIOUS UTC DAY
- ------------------------------------------------
-
- C M X S 1 2 3 4 Total (%)
- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- ------
- Uncorrellated: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 001 (100.0)
-
- Total Events: 001 optical and x-ray.
-
-
- EVENTS WITH SWEEPS AND/OR OPTICAL PHENOMENA FOR THE LAST UTC DAY
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date Begin Max End Xray Op Region Locn Sweeps/Optical Observations
- ------ ---- ---- ---- ---- -- ------ ------ ---------------------------
- NO EVENTS OBSERVED.
-
- NOTES:
- All times are in Universal Time (UT). Characters preceding begin, max,
- and end times are defined as: B = Before, U = Uncertain, A = After.
- All times associated with x-ray flares (ex. flares which produce
- associated x-ray bursts) refer to the begin, max, and end times of the
- x-rays. Flares which are not associated with x-ray signatures use the
- optical observations to determine the begin, max, and end times.
-
- Acronyms used to identify sweeps and optical phenomena include:
-
- II = Type II Sweep Frequency Event
- III = Type III Sweep
- IV = Type IV Sweep
- V = Type V Sweep
- Continuum = Continuum Radio Event
- Loop = Loop Prominence System,
- Spray = Limb Spray,
- Surge = Bright Limb Surge,
- EPL = Eruptive Prominence on the Limb.
-
-
- ** End of Daily Report **
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1994 23:25:43 GMT
- From: rwc@flare.syd.ips.oz.au (Regional Warning Centre)
- Subject: IPS Daily Report - 30 September 94
-
- SUBJ: IPS DAILY SOLAR AND GEOPHYSICAL REPORT
- ISSUED AT 30/2330Z SEPTEMBER 1994 BY IPS RADIO AND SPACE SERVICES
- FROM THE REGIONAL WARNING CENTRE (RWC), SYDNEY.
- SUMMARY FOR 30 SEPTEMBER AND FORECAST FOR 01 OCTOBER - 03 OCTOBER
- -----------------------------------------------------------
- 1A. SOLAR SUMMARY
- Activity: very low
-
- Flares: none.
-
- Observed 10.7 cm flux/Equivalent Sunspot Number : 74/11
-
- GOES satellite data for 29 Sep
- Daily Proton Fluence >1 MeV: 2.2E+05
- Daily Proton Fluence >10 MeV: 1.4E+04
- Daily Electron Fluence >2 MeV: 3.8E+07 (normal)
- X-ray background: A2.6
- Fluence (flux accumulation over 24hrs)/ cm2-ster-day.
-
- 1B. SOLAR FORECAST
- 01 Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct
- Activity Very low Very low Very low
- Fadeouts None expected None expected None expected
-
- Forecast 10.7 cm flux/Equivalent Sunspot Number for 01 Oct: 75/13
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------
- 2A. MAGNETIC SUMMARY
- Geomagnetic field at Learmonth: quiet
-
- Estimated Indices : A K Observed A Index 29 Sep
- Learmonth 4 2122 1111
- Fredericksburg 5 7
- Planetary 5 7
-
- Observed Kp for 29 Sep: 2232 1111
- 2B. MAGNETIC FORECAST
- DATE Ap CONDITIONS
- 01 Oct 8 Quiet
- 02 Oct 8 Quiet
- 03 Oct 8 Quiet to unsettled
- COMMENT: Minor storm levels are expected 4-5 October due to coronal
- hole.
- -----------------------------------------------------------
- 3A. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION SUMMARY
- LATITUDE BAND
- DATE LOW MIDDLE HIGH
- 30 Sep normal normal normal
- PCA Event : None.
-
- 3B. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION FORECAST
- LATITUDE BAND
- DATE LOW MIDDLE HIGH
- 01 Oct normal normal fair
- 02 Oct normal normal fair
- 03 Oct normal normal fair
- COMMENT: HF Comms are expected to be degraded during interval 5-6
- October, particularly at high lats.
- -----------------------------------------------------------
- 4A. AUSTRALIAN REGION IONOSPHERIC SUMMARY
- Observed
- DATE T-index MUFs at Sydney
- 30 Sep 25 near predicted monthly values
-
- Predicted Monthly T-index for September: 20
-
- 4B. AUSTRALIAN REGION IONOSPHERIC FORECAST
- DATE T-index MUFs
- 01 Oct 25 Near predicted monthly values
- 02 Oct 25 Near predicted monthly values
- 03 Oct 25 Near predicted monthly values
- COMMENT: Degraded HF comms expected 5-6 October due to anticipated
- coronal hole induced disturbance. Ionospheric response to anticipated
- magnetic activity may be stronger during this rotation due to change
- of season.
-
- --
- IPS Regional Warning Centre, Sydney |IPS Radio and Space Services
- RWC Duty Forecaster tel: +61 2 4148329 |PO Box 5606
- Recorded Message tel: +61 2 4148330 |West Chatswood NSW 2057
- email: rwc@ips.oz.au fax: +61 2 4148331 |AUSTRALIA
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 1 Oct 1994 12:21:08 GMT
- From: brian@nothing.ucsd.edu (Brian Kantor)
- Subject: Radio Shack Violation
-
- brian.parker@pcappbbs.com (Brian Parker) writes:
- Just to be curious I went back to the same store. There
- >was a different salesman and I was still able to key the unit.
-
- So, did you identify the transmission you made?
-
- Did you have permission to operate the station in the store?
-
- - Brian
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Sep 1994 11:31:55 -0400
- From: jeffp@access1.digex.net (Jeff Poretsky)
- Subject: Radio Shack Violation
-
- horak@convex.com (David Horak) writes:
-
- >In <9409300400112135@pcappbbs.com> brian.parker@pcappbbs.com (Brian Parker) writes:
-
- >Does the HTX-202 have a keylock or a PTT lock? Or is that asking a
- >bit much for the salesman to invoke :-)
-
- >David
- Yes It does, and it takes less than 10 seconds to engage it.
-
- And I expect it will take me even less time to dis-engage the lockout
- when my license finally arrives :) (4 weeks and counting)
-
- JeffP
- ?3???
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1994 23:23:28 GMT
- From: clay@panix.com (Clay Irving)
- Subject: Summary: Shops in NYC and Boston
-
- In article <jukka.780927532@clinet.fi> jukka@clinet.fi (Jukka Salomaa) writes:
-
- >I got many replies for my inquiry about ham shops in NYC and Boston area.
- >Thank's for you all! Here's the summary:
- >
- >New York's best ham shop is Ham Radio Outlet, Los Angeles, Ca.
-
- I'd have to disagree. Certainly, Manhattan's best ham shop is Ham Radio
- Outlet, Salem, NH! These guys aren't only nice, they're knowledgeable
- and helpful. I've had them call me back after placing an order just to
- tell me that one item is backordered...
-
- .-. .-.
- / \ .-. .-. / \
- / \ / \ .-. _ .-. / \ / \
- -/--Clay Irving-(N2VKG)\-----/---\---/-\---/---\-----/-----\-------/-------\--
- clay@panix.com \ / `-' `-' \ / \ /
- New York, New York `-' `-' \ /
- `-' `-'
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Sep 1994 20:31:28 -0700
- From: hbs@crl.com (Henry B. Smith)
- Subject: The Hamblaster
-
- WILLCO788 (willco788@aol.com) wrote:
- : Roger Clark at rjc@crosfield.co.uk tried to get in touch with me about
- : the Hamblaster. For some reason I was unable to return his E-mail.
-
- : I hope that he sees message this and replies via E-mail at my address.
-
- : Jack Albert
-
- : WA9FVP
-
-
- So what's happened to the hamblaster. It was such a big deal at one time,
- There was a mail list about it but the list went silent. Even saw a piece
- in QST about it.
-
- Where is it now?
-
- --
- Henry Smith (hbs@crl.com)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1994 05:46:15 GMT
- From: linley@netcom.com (Bruce James Robert Linley)
- Subject: What does all call signs have been issued?
-
- In ye olden post i9261739@wsuaix.csc.wsu.edu (Mike Wallendahl) spake...
- >It means that you will get a Novice class license instead, if I am
- >correct. I am a Tech No Code but carry a Novice license because all the
- >Tech licenses for group 7 have been issued.
-
- True, but all the call signs aren't really used up. A _lot_ of them have
- long since expired, yet the FCC isn't recycling them. Not sure why, though.
-
- --
- Bruce James Robert Linley Left Brain ----> linley@netcom.com
- KE6EQZ Right Brain ---> linley1@aol.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Sep 1994 17:04:03 GMT
- From: forbes@intac.com (Thom Forbes)
- Subject: Yaesu 5200- How do u like?
-
- In article <Cwwvx7.Ar6@srgenprp.sr.hp.com>, bsplaine@dogxray.sr.hp.com (Bill Splaine) says:
- >
- >I am interested in buying a FT5200 for my motorcycle.... I am looking for
- >a bullet proof 2/70cm with a detachable face that can operate Xband Repeat.
- >
- >Don't need many memories... ~20/band would be more than enough....
- >
- >I am also interested in a Kenwood 733/732 or anything that meets the above.
- >
- >Suggestions/experiences wanted.... thanks, Bill
- >
- >--
- >/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
- >\ Bill Splaine E-MAIL > bsplaine@sr.hp.com /
-
- I've used an FT-5200 in my Jeep for over a year and LOVE it! Its small size and detachable front panel
- make it a real winner. The 14 memories per band are more than adequate for my application.
-
- I've also used the radio on packet where it performed flawlessly. With its "extended" recieve coverage
- it also doubles as a scanner, eliminating the need for another radio in the mobile. With the search/scan
- controls on the DTMF mike, use while mobile quickly becomes second nature. The "crossband repeat"
- is also a nice feature. The instruction book is quite complete, and includes all schematics.
-
- Hope this helps in your decission.
-
- 73
- -Thom- / N2CBV
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1994 14:02:29 GMT
- From: dtiller@cscsun.rmc.edu (David Tiller)
-
- References<CwDxGt.6x8@cup.hp.com> <linleyCwKGsn.DG0@netcom.com>, <35ut3f$r9r@safety.ics.uci.edu>
- Subject: Re: Restrictive Covenants: I can't have *any* antenna?
-
- Clark Savage Turner (turner@safety.ics.uci.edu) wrote:
- : In <linleyCwKGsn.DG0@netcom.com> linley@netcom.com (Bruce James Robert Linley) writes:
-
- : >In ye olden post jholly@cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback) spake...
- : >>Michael R. Dow (R1156C@WACCVM.CORP.MOT.COM) wrote:
- : >>
- : >>: GENERAL RESTRICTIONS:
- : >>
-
- : >Gee, this one looks easy. Apparently, transmitting antennae (_designed_ for
- : >transmitting, i.e. low SWR) are OK. Also, since your station is not intended
-
- : This is NOT correct. Any judge I know would laugh you out of the courtroom,
- : or maybe fine you and your attorney for wasting the court's time. The intent
- : of the provision is clear, little loopholes are not respected in real
- : courtrooms I have visited (though if you believe that the media always gets
- : its facts straight, you would have a different picture :-)
- : Again, nonsense. Complete nonsense as far as real life attorneys and
- : judges that I have met. Your point about money for them is well taken,
- : however, you had better have a good argument if you are about to take
- : the time, money and effort to invest in such a thing. I wouldn't take
- : this direction suggested, it is a waste of time.
- : Again, please make "reasonable" interpretations and statements when you
- : represent ham radio to people who don't know us. These silly attempts
- : to use technicalities, if used in public, will put all of ham radio in
- : a very bad light as far as the public is concerned. We need mature,
- : reasoned approaches to the problems that face us.
-
- So there's no room for a pooly written rule to be challenged where the intend
- is _not_ so clear? My reading of that rule's intent is to preclude antennas
- that challenge cable's monopoly, _not_ limit other radio services (such as
- cellular phones, ham radio, etc.) I think a well reasoned challenge to this
- rule would be a boost to hams and possibly the community by showing how hams
- can help out in times of emergency. My neighbors know who to come to when
- they've got loved ones they want to contact in a disaster area!!!
-
- : Admitted to practice law in California, Massachusetts, and New York.
-
- ^^^^^^^^ Don't be ashamed of it, somebody has to do it!!!! 8-)
- --
- David Tiller | Network Administrator | Voice: (804) 752-3710 |
- dtiller@rmc.edu | n2kau/4 | Randolph-Macon College| Fax: (804) 752-7231 |
- "Drunk, [Beowulf] slew no | P.O. Box 5005 | ICBM: 37d 42' 43.75" N |
- hearth companions." | Ashland, Va 23005 | 77d 31' 32.19" W |
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Sep 94 16:25:27 -0800
- From: harrisok@vax.sonoma.edu
-
- References<1994Sep30.172734.23514@news.csuohio.edu> <lestrade.780958492@Ra.MsState.Edu>, <30SEP199417102389@elroy.uh.edu>
- Subject: Re: Radio Shack Violation
-
- In article <30SEP199417102389@elroy.uh.edu>, n5ljv@uh.edu (Brad Killebrew N5LJV) writes:
- > I think it might be a good idea that the TX STOP function come ENABLED
- > from the factory. Then, the customer should learn how to DISABLE it before
- > they can talk on the radio. What do you think?
-
- Could this be a way to put the individuals responsibility to follow the
- rules on someone else? I don't think this would be such a hot OR effect
- idea. I do see your point that making a customer READ the manual will
- increase the odds that they will read they must have a license before
- transmitting. This will in no way stop the person who is intent on
- transmitting illegally, only slow him down a minute or two. It WOULD make
- the employees at RS very irritated at the customers who would (no doubt!)
- be returning their "defective" radios!
-
- This reminds me of a couple of funny posts on USENET by amateur(s) waiting
- for their license to arrive. It seems they have the radios all ready to go
- but have decided that they can't trust themselves enough not to transmit, so
- they have enabled the TX Stop. Ha! Go figure... again...
-
- Ken
- ---
- ____________________________________________________________________
- | Ken Harrison | Moosehead: Great beer! |
- | N6MHG | |
- | harrisok@sonoma.edu | ...and a new experience for the moose! |
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Sep 94 16:09:56 -0800
- From: harrisok@vax.sonoma.edu
-
- References<9409300400112135@pcappbbs.com> <1994Sep30.172734.23514@news.csuohio.edu>, <lestrade.780958492@Ra.MsState.Edu>
- Subject: Re: Radio Shack Violation
-
- In article <lestrade.780958492@Ra.MsState.Edu>, lestrade@Ra.MsState.Edu (John Patrick Lestrade) writes:
- > Is it any more of a `violation' for someone to pick up an ht on the rs
- > counter and `kerchunk' a repeater as it is for someone who does NOT have
- > a driver's license to start the engine of a car in a showroom?
-
- Yes, because the starting of the engine of a car is more comparable to
- turning the HT on. The actual transmitting with the HT and "kerchunking"
- a repeater is analogous to "driving" the car. Of course, no license,
- not legal.
-
- My question, however, is why would Radio Shack be the responsible party?
- Isn't the person who makes the actual transmission the responsible party?
- Maybe this is another example of those in our society not wanting to take
- responsibility for themselves...
-
- > If a tree falls in the forest...:-)
-
- hm. smells like dog poop... ;-)
-
- Ken
- --
- ____________________________________________________________________
- | Ken Harrison | Moosehead: Great beer! |
- | N6MHG | |
- | harrisok@sonoma.edu | ...and a new experience for the moose! |
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #1082
- ******************************
-